Alabama Supreme Court Invalidated Interior Design Practice Act
Contact:
Edward S. Nagorsky, General Counsel and Director of Legislative Affairs
800-843-6522, ext. 2289;
Hackettstown, NJ (October 22, 2007)
In a broad, sweeping decision, the Supreme Court of Alabama unanimously struck down that
state's interior design practice act, holding the law in its entirety unconstitutional and
unenforceable.
In so finding, the Court held that the Act "imposes restrictions that are unnecessary and
unreasonable upon the pursuit of useful activities" and that the restrictions "do not bear some
substantial relation to the public health, safety, or morals, or to the general welfare, the public
convenience, or to the general prosperity."
In a long and detailed concurring opinion, Justice Parker noted that the Court has continued to
recognize the value of economic liberties, including the liberty of contract and the right to
engage in an occupation. "The State's argument that certification of interior designers is
necessary to ensure that designers are competent to choose safe products for use in interior
design fails for two reasons: (1) federal and state commissions already exist to ensure that unsafe
materials are not available for use in homes or businesses; and (2) there is no state requirement
that homeowners or businesses retain any interior decorator or designer to decorate their homes
or offices".
Justice Parker further stated,
"If the public interest is not threatened by allowing homeowners and businesspersons to
design their own houses and offices, it is difficult to understand how that interest is
threatened by allowing them to retain interior designers who are not certified."
He concluded by saying:
“Not only are [the appellee designer's] rights to contract and to engage in her chosen
occupation at stake in this case, but also the rights of the people of Alabama to contract
with her. If a homeowner or businessperson wants to express himself by decorating his
home or his office in a certain way, and if that person believes [appellee designer] can
best provide the design that he desires, the State should not tell that person that he may
not contract with [appellee designer] merely because [appellee designer] lacks state
certification or an academic degree. Nor should this Court embrace the paternalistic
notion that the average citizen is incapable of choosing a competent interior designer
without the State's help.”
NKBA applauds the well-reasoned and practical decision of the Alabama Supreme Court and
looks forward to presenting this opinion to the other state legislatures which may be considering
similar, ill advised legislation.
About the National Kitchen & Bath Association
The National Kitchen & Bath Association (NKBA) is a non-profit trade association that has educated and
led the kitchen and bath industry since 1963. With nearly 40,000 members and growing, NKBA owns the
Kitchen/Bath Industry Show & Conference (K/BIS), the world’s largest trade show dedicated to the
kitchen and bath industry. The mission of NKBA is to enhance member success and excellence, promote
professionalism and ethical business practices and provide leadership and direction for the kitchen and
bath industry. For more information, visit www.nkba.org or contact the NKBA at 800-843-6522
|